Essay 12: Is the Death Penalty Best Deterrent To Curb Crime?

There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measures will be needed. Discuss both sides.

1 (Death Penalty vs. Alternative Measures: Tackling Serious Crimes)

The rate of crime is increasing each year, creating a worrisome situation for governments. Although there are some people who consider the death penalty as the best solution to curb the spike in dangerous crimes, many view initiatives like the provision of job opportunities and education facilities as superior options.

On one hand, a section of society believes capital punishment to be the optimal solution for the eradication of crimes. They believe that life is precious to everyone, and fear of death would definitely deter people from committing serious crimes. They have sound evidence to provide through the example of countries like China and Iran that applied the severe punishment rule to crimes of serious nature and have observed a downtrend in crimes. Similarly, Saudi Arabia has witnessed negligible cases of murder and rape since the announcement of beheading criminals involved in such crimes. Thus, this group of people has a valid argument to support the death penalty.

On the other hand, it is propagated by many that the death sentence alone may not be sufficient for lowering the crime rate. This is because, firstly, people need to be given enough earning opportunities so that they do not have to look for illegal means to feed themselves. To illustrate, a recent survey by Daily Mail revealed that 60% of juvenile delinquents caught by police committed crimes just because they could not find jobs to earn a livelihood. Secondly, education for all can be instrumental in imparting awareness about the consequences of opting wrong means to make both ends meet. That is to say, those who are educated are less likely to get attracted to criminal activities due to the awareness of unpleasant consequences given to them by their teachers; hence, legally earn instead of indulging in crimes for making money.

To conclude, the death penalty is the best-considered solution by some to tackle dangerous criminal acts as it creates fear in potential criminals and bars them from doing heinous crimes; however, many suggested additional solutions to overcome the increasing rate of crimes, such as compulsory education and creation of jobs.

2 (The Death Penalty Debate: Effective Deterrent or Inhumane Punishment?)

In recent times, the issue of serious crimes has been a matter of great concern for societies across the globe. While some individuals argue that the death penalty serves as a potent deterrent to curb such heinous acts, others believe that alternative measures are needed to address the root causes of these crimes. This essay will explore both perspectives in detail before drawing a conclusion.

On one hand, proponents of the death penalty argue that it is the most effective way to deter individuals from committing serious crimes. They contend that the prospect of facing the ultimate punishment will make people think twice before engaging in activities that could result in such consequences. Furthermore, they argue that the death penalty sends a clear message to potential offenders that society will not tolerate such criminal behavior.

However, opponents of the death penalty argue that it is an ineffective and barbaric method of punishment. They argue that research has consistently shown that the death penalty does not serve as a deterrent. Moreover, they assert that the possibility of executing an innocent person is a significant risk that cannot be ignored. Instead of relying on the death penalty, they propose alternative measures, such as increased investment in education, social welfare, and mental health services, to address the underlying causes of serious crimes.

In conclusion, while the death penalty is seen by some as an effective deterrent against serious crimes, it is not a panacea for the issue. Instead, it is crucial to address the root causes of criminal behavior by investing in alternative measures. By providing individuals with education, social welfare, and mental health services, we can work to create a society where serious crimes are less likely to occur. Ultimately, it is only through a comprehensive approach that we can hope to make our communities safer and more secure.

3 (Curbing Serious Crimes: A Comprehensive Approach)

The rising incidence of serious crimes is a grave concern for societies worldwide. Some people believe that the death penalty is the most effective way to deter individuals from committing such heinous acts. On the other hand, many others argue that alternative measures are necessary to tackle the underlying causes of these crimes. This essay will examine both perspectives and provide a reasoned conclusion.

Those in favor of the death penalty argue that it serves as a powerful deterrent. They believe that the prospect of facing the ultimate punishment will instill fear in potential offenders and prevent them from committing serious crimes. Additionally, they argue that it acts as a form of retribution for the victims and their families, providing them with a sense of closure and justice.

However, opponents of the death penalty claim that it is an inhumane and ineffective method of punishment. They argue that studies have shown no conclusive evidence that the death penalty serves as a deterrent. Moreover, there is always the risk of executing an innocent person, which is a grave injustice. Furthermore, they argue that the underlying causes of serious crimes, such as poverty, social inequality, and lack of education, must be addressed through a comprehensive approach involving education, social welfare programs, and mental health services.

For instance, in countries where the death penalty is abolished, such as Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, the crime rates are relatively low. Instead of relying on the death penalty, these countries have invested in social welfare programs, education, and mental health services. As a result, their citizens are less likely to engage in criminal activities.

In conclusion, while the death penalty may seem like an effective deterrent, it is not a comprehensive solution to addressing the underlying causes of serious crimes. Instead, alternative measures, such as investing in education, social welfare, and mental health services, are necessary to create a society where such crimes are less likely to occur. Ultimately, it is only through a multi-faceted approach that we can hope to make our communities safer and more secure.

Did you like these sample responses? Read more here:

• Some people think that paying taxes is their only duty, while others believe that we have more responsibilities towards our society. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
  
• Some people say that to produce a happier society we must ensure that there is a small difference in earnings between the rich and the poor. To what extent do you agree?
  
• Some people believe that it is better to spend more money to eliminate the cause of crime, while others think that the government should spend more on punishment. Discuss both views and give your opinion.